SAG Legal

SAG Legal

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023

Section 238 – BNSS | Effect of errors.

Section 238 : Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 238 – BNSS | Effect of errors. No error in stating either the offence or the particulars required to be stated in the charge, and no omission to state the offence or those particulars, shall be regarded at any stage of the case as material, unless the accused was in fact misled by such error or omission, and it has occasioned a failure of justice.Illustrations.(a) A is charged under section 180 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with “having been in possession of counterfeit coin, having known at the time when he became possessed thereof that such coin was counterfeit,” the word “fraudulently” being omitted in the charge. Unless it appears that A was in fact misled by this omission, the error shall not be regarded as material.(b) A is charged with cheating B, and the manner in which he cheated B is not set out in the charge or is set out incorrectly. A defends himself, calls witnesses and gives his own account of the transaction. The Court may infer from this that the omission to set out the manner of the cheating is not material.(c) A is charged with cheating B, and the manner in which he cheated B is not set out in the charge. There were many transactions between A and B, and A had no means of knowing to which of them the charge referred, and offered no defence. The Court may infer from such facts that the omission to set out the manner of the cheating was, in the case, a material error.(d) A is charged with the murder of Khoda Baksh on the 21st January, 2023. In fact, the murdered person’s name was Haidar Baksh, and the date of the murder was the 20th January, 2023. A was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which referred exclusively to the case of Haidar Baksh. The Court may infer from these facts that A was not misled, and that the error in the charge was immaterial.(e) A was charged with murdering Haidar Baksh on the 20th January, 2023, and Khoda Baksh (who tried to arrest him for that murder) on the 21st January, 2023. When charged for the murder of Haidar Baksh, he was tried for the murder of Khoda Baksh. The witnesses present in his defence were witnesses in the case of Haidar Baksh. The Court may infer from this that A was misled, and that the error was material

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023

Section 237 – BNSS | Words in charge taken in sense of law under which offence is punishable.

Section 237 : Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 237 – BNSS | Words in charge taken in sense of law under which offence is punishable. In every charge words used in describing an offence shall be deemed to have been used in the sense attached to them respectively by the law under which such offence is punishable.

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023

Section 42 – BNSS | Protection of members of Armed Forces from arrest

Section 42 : Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 42 – BNSS | Protection of members of Armed Forces from arrest (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 35 and sections 39 to 41 (both inclusive), no member of the Armed Forces of the Union shall be arrested for anything done or purported to be done by him in the discharge of his official duties except after obtaining the consent of the Central Government.  (2) The State Government may, by notification, direct that the provisions of sub-section (1) shall apply to such class or category of the members of the Force charged with the maintenance of public order as may be specified therein, wherever they may be serving, and thereupon the provisions of that sub-section shall apply as if for the expression “Central Government” occurring therein, the expression “State Government” were substituted.

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023

Section 236 – BNSS | When manner of committing offence must be stated.

Section 236 : Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 236 – BNSS | When manner of committing offence must be stated. When the nature of the case is such that the particulars mentioned in sections 234 and 235 do not give the accused sufficient notice of the matter with which he is charged, the charge shall also contain such particulars of the manner in which the alleged offence was committed as will be sufficient for that purpose.Illustrations.(a) A is accused of the theft of a certain article at a certain time and place. The charge need not set out the manner in which the theft was effected.(b) A is accused of cheating B at a given time and place. The charge must set out the manner in which A cheated B.(c) A is accused of giving false evidence at a given time and place. The charge must set out that portion of the evidence given by A which is alleged to be false.(d) A is accused of obstructing B, a public servant, in the discharge of his public functions at a given time and place. The charge must set out the manner in which A obstructed B in the discharge of his functions.(e) A is accused of the murder of B at a given time and place. The charge need not state the manner in which A murdered B.(f) A is accused of disobeying a direction of the law with intent to save B from punishment. The charge must set out the disobedience charged and the law infringed

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023

Section 41 – BNSS | Arrest by Magistrate

Section 41 : Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 41 – BNSS | Arrest by Magistrate (1) When any offence is committed in the presence of a Magistrate, whether Executive or Judicial, within his local jurisdiction, he may himself arrest or order any person to arrest the offender, and may thereupon, subject to the provisions herein contained as to bail, commit the offender to custody.  (2) Any Magistrate, whether Executive or Judicial, may at any time arrest or direct the arrest, in his presence, within his local jurisdiction, of any person for whose arrest he is competent at the time and in the circumstances to issue a warrant.

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023

Section 235 – BNSS | Particulars as to time, place and person.

Section 235 : Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 235 – BNSS | Particulars as to time, place and person. (1) The charge shall contain such particulars as to the time and place of the alleged offence, and the person (if any) against whom, or the thing (if any) in respect of which, it was committed, as are reasonably sufficient to give the accused notice of the matter with which he is charged.(2) When the accused is charged with criminal breach of trust or dishonest misappropriation of money or other movable property, it shall be sufficient to specify the gross sum or, as the case may be, describe the movable property in respect of which the offence is alleged to have been committed, and the dates between which the offence is alleged to have been committed, without specifying particular items or exact dates, and the charge so framed shall be deemed to be a charge of one offence within the meaning ofsection 242: Provided that the time included between the first and last of such dates shall not exceed one year.

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023

Section 234 – BNSS | Contents of charge.

Section 234 : Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 234 – BNSS | Contents of charge. (1) Every charge under this Sanhita shall state the offence with which the accused is charged.(2) If the law which creates the offence gives it any specific name, the offence may be described in the charge by that name only.(3) If the law which creates the offence does not give it any specific name, so much of the definition of the offence must be stated as to give the accused notice of the matter with which he is charged.(4) The law and section of the law against which the offence is said to have been committed shall be mentioned in the charge.(5) The fact that the charge is made is equivalent to a statement that every legal condition required by law to constitute the offence charged was fulfilled in the particular case.(6) The charge shall be written in the language of the Court.(7) If the accused, having been previously convicted of any offence, is liable, by reason of such previous conviction, to enhanced punishment, or to punishment of a different kind, for a subsequent offence, and it is intended to prove such previous conviction for the purpose of affecting the punishment which the Court may think fit, to award for the subsequent offence, the fact, date and place of the previous conviction shall be stated in the charge; and if such statement has been omitted, the Court may add it at any time beforesentence is passed.Illustrations.(a) A is charged with the murder of B. This is equivalent to a statement that A’s act fell within the definition of murder given in sections 100 and 101 of the Bharatiya NyayaSanhita, 2023; that it did not fall within any of the general exceptions of the said Sanhita; and that it did not fall within any of the five exceptions to section 101 thereof, or that, if it did fall within Exception 1, one or other of the three provisos to that exception applied to it.(b) A is charged under sub-section (2) of section 118 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with voluntarily causing grievous hurt to B by means of an instrument for shooting. This is equivalent to a statement that the case was not provided for by sub-section (2) of section 122 of the said Sanhita, and that the general exceptions did not apply to it.(c) A is accused of murder, cheating, theft, extortion, or criminal intimidation, or using a false property-mark. The charge may state that A committed murder, or cheating, or theft, or extortion, or criminal intimidation, or that he used a false propertymark, without reference to the definitions, of those crimes contained in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; but the sections under which the offence is punishable must, in each instance be referred to in the charge.(d) A is charged under section 219 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, with intentionally obstructing a sale of property offered for sale by the lawful authority of a public servant. The charge should be in those words

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023

Section 233 – BNSS | Procedure to be followed when there is a complaint case and police investigation in respect of same offence

Section 233 : Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 233 – BNSS | Procedure to be followed when there is a complaint case and police investigation in respect of same offence (1) When in a case instituted otherwise than on a police report (hereinafter referred to as a complaint case), it is made to appear to the Magistrate, during the course of the inquiry or trial held by him, that an investigation by the police is in progress in relation to the offence which is the subject-matter of the inquiry or trial held by him, the Magistrate shall stay the proceedings of such inquiry or trial and call for a report on the matter from the police officer conducting the investigation.(2) If a report is made by the investigating police officer under section 193 and on such report cognizance of any offence is taken by the Magistrate against any person who is an accused in the complaint case, the Magistrate shall inquire into or try together the complaint case and the case arising out of the police report as if both the cases were instituted on a police report.(3) If the police report does not relate to any accused in the complaint case or if the Magistrate does not take cognizance of any offence on the police report, he shall proceed with the inquiry or trial, which was stayed by him, in accordance with the provisions of this Sanhita.

Uncategorized

Uniform Civil Code in India: Balancing Equality & Diversity

Uniform Civil Code in India: Balancing Equality & Diversity The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) has long been a pivotal and contentious issue in India, sparking debates about legal uniformity, social justice, and cultural preservation. As India strides towards modernization, the quest for a UCC continues to evoke strong opinions from various sections of society. This article delves deep into the UCC, exploring its historical roots, arguments for and against, current developments, and its potential impact on Indian society. What is the Uniform Civil Code? A Uniform Civil Code refers to a set of secular laws that apply to all citizens of a country, irrespective of their religion, caste, or community. In the Indian context, the UCC aims to replace the existing personal laws— which are specific to different religious communities— with a single, comprehensive legal framework governing personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption. Historical Context of the UCC in India The idea of a UCC is embedded in the Indian Constitution, specifically in Article 44 of the Directive Principles of State Policy, which states: “The State shall endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.” However, this directive has remained unimplemented due to India’s vast cultural and religious diversity. Personal laws in India are currently governed by different scriptures and customs, including Hindu Law, Muslim Law, Christian Law, and others, a legacy inherited from the British colonial period. Why Advocate for a Uniform Civil Code? 1. Promoting Equality and Gender Justice One of the foremost arguments for the UCC is the promotion of gender equality. Many personal laws contain provisions that are discriminatory towards women, particularly in areas like inheritance and divorce. A UCC can standardize these laws, ensuring equal rights and protections for all genders. 2. Enhancing National Integration A single set of laws can foster a sense of national unity and social cohesion, transcending religious and cultural differences. By applying the same legal standards to all citizens, the UCC can mitigate sectarian conflicts and promote a unified national identity. 3. Legal Simplification and Efficiency The current system of multiple personal laws creates complexity and confusion within the legal framework. A UCC would streamline legal processes, making the judiciary more efficient and accessible to the common citizen. 4. Upholding Secularism Implementing a UCC aligns with the secular ethos of the Indian Constitution, ensuring that all citizens are treated equally under the law, regardless of their religious affiliations. Criticisms and Concerns Against the UCC 1. Threat to Cultural and Religious Autonomy Critics argue that personal laws are an integral part of religious freedom and cultural identity. Imposing a UCC could infringe upon the rights of communities to govern their personal affairs according to their traditions and beliefs. 2. Challenges of Diversity and Pluralism India’s cultural and religious diversity poses a significant challenge to the implementation of a UCC. Each community has its own unique practices and legal traditions, making it difficult to craft a one-size-fits-all code without alienating certain groups. 3. Practical Implementation Hurdles Developing a UCC that is acceptable to all communities is a monumental task. The diverse nature of Indian society means reconciling different legal traditions into a single code involves navigating complex social and political landscapes. 4. Risk of Majoritarian Bias There is a concern that the UCC might be influenced by the majority community’s norms and values, potentially sidelining minority perspectives and practices, leading to feelings of marginalization. Current Status and Recent Developments As of January 2025, the debate over the UCC remains unresolved, with periodic calls for its implementation from various political parties and social groups. While some states have made incremental moves towards legal uniformity in specific areas, a comprehensive national UCC has yet to materialize. Legislative Efforts Recent legislative initiatives have focused on areas such as inheritance and marriage laws, aiming to bridge gaps between different personal laws. However, these efforts often encounter resistance from communities concerned about losing their legal autonomy. Judicial Interventions The Supreme Court of India has played a crucial role in the UCC discourse, delivering landmark judgments that emphasize social justice and gender equality, thereby indirectly fueling the UCC debate. Potential Implications of Implementing a Uniform Civil Code Social Equality and Empowerment A UCC could significantly advance social equality by eliminating discriminatory practices embedded in various personal laws. This would empower marginalized groups, particularly women, ensuring their rights are uniformly protected across all communities. Legal Uniformity and Efficiency A single set of laws would simplify legal proceedings, making the judiciary more efficient and accessible. It would reduce the need for specialized legal expertise in personal matters, thereby democratizing access to justice. Cultural Impact and Preservation While aiming for uniformity, the UCC could inadvertently homogenize diverse cultural practices, potentially leading to a loss of cultural richness. Striking a balance between uniformity and cultural diversity is essential to maintain India’s pluralistic fabric. Political Ramifications The UCC remains a politically charged issue. Its implementation could influence electoral dynamics, alliances, and policy-making, as different political entities navigate the sensitivities surrounding personal laws. Path Forward: Achieving a Progressive Uniform Civil Code For the UCC to be successfully implemented, it must balance promoting equality with respecting cultural diversity. Key strategies include: Inclusive Legislation Engaging all communities in the drafting process ensures that diverse perspectives are represented, fostering broader acceptance and minimizing resistance. Gradual and Phased Implementation A phased approach allows for adjustments based on feedback and helps mitigate opposition by addressing concerns incrementally. Flexibility and Safeguards Incorporating provisions that respect cultural nuances without compromising on fundamental rights can help maintain harmony and inclusivity. Public Awareness and Education Informing citizens about the benefits of a UCC and addressing misconceptions can build support and facilitate smoother implementation. Conclusion The Uniform Civil Code stands at the intersection of India’s aspirations for social justice and its commitment to cultural pluralism. While the promise of equality and national unity is compelling, the challenges of cultural sensitivity and legal complexity cannot be overlooked. Achieving a UCC that honors India’s diversity

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023

Section 232 – BNSS | Commitment of case to Court of Session when offence is triable exclusively by it.

Section 232 : Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 232 – BNSS | Commitment of case to Court of Session when offence is triable exclusively by it. When in a case instituted on a police report or otherwise, the accused appears or is brought before the Magistrate and it appears to the Magistrate that the offence is triable exclusively by the Court of Session, he shall—(a) commit, after complying with the provisions of section 230 or section 231 the case to the Court of Session, and subject to the provisions of this Sanhita relating to bail, remand the accused to custody until such commitment has been made;(b) subject to the provisions of this Sanhita relating to bail, remand the accused to custody during, and until the conclusion of, the trial;(c) send to that Court the record of the case and the documents and articles, if any, which are to be produced in evidence;(d) notify the Public Prosecutor of the commitment of the case to the Court of Session: Provided that the proceedings under this section shall be completed within a period of ninety days from the date of taking cognizance, and such period may be extended by the Magistrate for a period not exceeding one hundred and eighty days for the reasons to be recorded in writing: Provided further that any application filed before the Magistrate by the accused or the victim or any person authorised by such person in a case triable by Court of Session, shall be forwarded to the Court of Session with the committal of the case.

SAG Legal

SAG Legal

Contact Details:

📞 Call us: 7300095838
📧 Email us: help@saglegal.in

Locate us on Google Maps Here

Scroll to Top